2026 Motorsports Season

One more test to go, lots of BS flowing, whos quickest and politics whos doing what.
Times don't mean much yet, Suspect next week we get better idea.

Also lots of complaining about car, slower in turns, early lifting and downshifting
to Harvest energy for more HP

Some saying less a race car than strategy, guess we all see in Melbourne
what the racing is like.
 
Cole Butcher, From Porters lake NS,
Started the truck series last night in Daytona, finsihed 14 th, cool start for him.
1771086104580.png


Little History, race from a kid locally, won a couple of Pro stock championships in the Maritimes,
Been racing in Northeast US last couple years, doing really well,
Now full time ride in truck series.
 
One more test to go, lots of BS flowing, whos quickest and politics whos doing what.
Times don't mean much yet, Suspect next week we get better idea.

Also lots of complaining about car, slower in turns, early lifting and downshifting
to Harvest energy for more HP

Some saying less a race car than strategy, guess we all see in Melbourne
what the racing is like.

I just read this Road & Track headline.

“Hamilton, Alonso, and Verstappen are not big fans of the new, more regen-focused cars.”
 
Cole Butcher, From Porters lake NS,
Started the truck series last night in Daytona, finsihed 14 th, cool start for him.
View attachment 92428

Little History, race from a kid locally, won a couple of Pro stock championships in the Maritimes,
Been racing in Northeast US last couple years, doing really well,
Now full time ride in truck series.
I bet that is a dream come true for him. Hope he does well.
 
I just hope there isn't a huge discrepancy on how the various teams cars perform this season. The best racing to watch is when cars are evenly matched, and the drivers have talent.
Typically regulation changes creates gaps
Most teams close it fast, some take 2-3 years

Interesting I read today F1 management are not happy with drivers comments.
Popularity is at all time high and growing
They want this to continue so
Could we or will we see fast changes
If so so racing?
 
Last day of testing today in Bahrain, before season starts
in Melbourne Australia.

Ferrari sets fastest time, but many believe Mercedes is sandbagging.
Merc is figured to best going into Melbourne,
Ferrari seems to have some tricks, 180 degree rear wing, trick defuser
we will see if any of this plays out to be a bonus.
Merc, Ferrari, Maclaren and Redbull look to still be top 4, at least to start.

Audi looks solid, Caddy doing ok, but nothing earth shattering,
the Big Surprise is Aston Martin, ( newys car) does not look good,
barely done any laps, Honda on back foot, how bad is it?

I expect fast changes even before Melbourne, some quick upgrades for all teams
as they all come to grips with massive rule changes.

Looks like power management will be the biggest skill to learn and deploy,
Faster on Striaghts and slower in turns and for now, not looking like any
improvment in overtaking, Most drivers thinks its not pure F-1.
I guess we all see in a few weeks.
 
I wonder if this statement from Max, may be one that F1 brass didn't like? I agree with him 100%.

Max Verstappen has made his views on the future of Formula 1 crystal clear, calling for the sport to stay true to its roots and not be influenced by the rise of electric racing. In a bold statement, Verstappen fired back against the push to increase battery use in F1, stating, “Don’t increase the battery, get rid of it! Formula E should be Formula E, and Formula 1 should stay as Formula 1.” His comments have reignited the ongoing debate about the direction F1 is heading as it continues to evolve in terms of sustainability and technology.
Verstappen’s purist view of F1 emphasizes the importance of maintaining the raw, thrilling experience that defines the sport. For the Dutch driver, F1 is about powerful engines, the roar of the cars, and the skill of the drivers—elements he feels would be diluted by a heavy focus on hybrid or fully electric technology. Verstappen’s comments come at a time when the sport is facing increased pressure to become more environmentally friendly, with hybrid power units and stricter emissions regulations already in place.
The rise of Formula E, with its all-electric cars, has raised questions about how F1 can balance the demands for sustainability with maintaining the essence of the sport. While F1 has embraced hybrid technology, Verstappen’s stance is that the sport should not move further into the electric realm. He has always been a strong advocate for the purity of racing, and his statement highlights the tension between technological innovation and the traditional nature of F1 racing.
For many fans, Verstappen’s comments reflect a larger concern about the future of motorsport. Will the soul of F1 be lost if it continues to adopt more eco-friendly technologies? Or will innovations like hybrid engines and sustainable fuels be able to coexist with the high-performance, thrilling racing that fans love? Verstappen’s vision for F1 as a sport driven by skill, engine power, and high-octane racing resonates with purists who fear that the sport might lose its edge in pursuit of greener alternatives.
As F1 continues to navigate its future, Verstappen’s stance is likely to be a defining point in the conversation. His purist view challenges the sport’s governing bodies and fans alike to find a balance between sustainability and preserving the thrilling, engine-powered racing that defines Formula 1. With Verstappen leading the charge, the debate about the future of the sport has never been more intense.
1771706055265.png
 
The new season of Netflix's series on F1 racing, called Drive To Survive is on next week.

I've really enjoyed the series the past several years. You can gain a lot of insight on the behind the scenes of this sport, the personality's of drivers and the key people in the teams.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this statement from Max, may be one that F1 brass didn't like? I agree with him 100%.

Max Verstappen has made his views on the future of Formula 1 crystal clear, calling for the sport to stay true to its roots and not be influenced by the rise of electric racing. In a bold statement, Verstappen fired back against the push to increase battery use in F1, stating, “Don’t increase the battery, get rid of it! Formula E should be Formula E, and Formula 1 should stay as Formula 1.” His comments have reignited the ongoing debate about the direction F1 is heading as it continues to evolve in terms of sustainability and technology.
Verstappen’s purist view of F1 emphasizes the importance of maintaining the raw, thrilling experience that defines the sport. For the Dutch driver, F1 is about powerful engines, the roar of the cars, and the skill of the drivers—elements he feels would be diluted by a heavy focus on hybrid or fully electric technology. Verstappen’s comments come at a time when the sport is facing increased pressure to become more environmentally friendly, with hybrid power units and stricter emissions regulations already in place.
The rise of Formula E, with its all-electric cars, has raised questions about how F1 can balance the demands for sustainability with maintaining the essence of the sport. While F1 has embraced hybrid technology, Verstappen’s stance is that the sport should not move further into the electric realm. He has always been a strong advocate for the purity of racing, and his statement highlights the tension between technological innovation and the traditional nature of F1 racing.
For many fans, Verstappen’s comments reflect a larger concern about the future of motorsport. Will the soul of F1 be lost if it continues to adopt more eco-friendly technologies? Or will innovations like hybrid engines and sustainable fuels be able to coexist with the high-performance, thrilling racing that fans love? Verstappen’s vision for F1 as a sport driven by skill, engine power, and high-octane racing resonates with purists who fear that the sport might lose its edge in pursuit of greener alternatives.
As F1 continues to navigate its future, Verstappen’s stance is likely to be a defining point in the conversation. His purist view challenges the sport’s governing bodies and fans alike to find a balance between sustainability and preserving the thrilling, engine-powered racing that defines Formula 1. With Verstappen leading the charge, the debate about the future of the sport has never been more intense.
View attachment 92564
I agree, but FOM will never agree, Audi came, caddy came, Ford came and Honda come back, beacuse of these
rules, they beleive some form for electric power is part of the future and F-1 is always cutting edge.
We will see, now they have sustainable fuels, if F-1 goes back to fuel powered cars in 2028.

The orignal rules were set to 2030, but last year agreed engines till 2028 then review.
 
Last edited:
The new season of Netflix's series on F1 racing, called Drive To Survive is on next week.

I've really enjoyed the series the past several years. You can gain a lot of insight on the behind the scenes of this sport, the personality's of drivers and the key people in the teams.
they pick and choose and mostly for Drama,
but your right, we get to see stuff we would never see otherwise.
 
my questions is simple, who was sandbagging and by how much,
how close will it be in Melbourne and who has the energy management
figure out the best so far?
 
Back
Top