67 AGAIN Enthusiast Yesterday at 8:02 PM #8,586 Ohtobbad said: View attachment 90010 Click to expand... The author of this poster needs to brush up on the early history. First three are off. #1 should be 64-68. #2 should be 65-68. #3 should be 69-70. And they’re missing 71-73 generation all together.
Ohtobbad said: View attachment 90010 Click to expand... The author of this poster needs to brush up on the early history. First three are off. #1 should be 64-68. #2 should be 65-68. #3 should be 69-70. And they’re missing 71-73 generation all together.
