2026 Motorsports Season
- Thread starter Mcdavis
- Start date
this was written this morning by one of the F-1 papers who follows and reports specifically on F-1
below is the storey they posted, hard to argue it.
Formula 1's bold leap into the future has thrown up more questions than answers following the season-opening Australian Grand Prix, which exposed the fundamental flaws in the 2026 regulations.
The Albert Park circuit became a showcase of everything wrong with the new hybrid formula. Cars crawled to 60 kilometres per hour on the straight between Turns 8 and 9 as batteries drained at alarming rates. Energy management, not pure speed, dictated lap times in a contradiction of what F1 represents.
Onboard footage revealed drivers lifting off when they should be attacking, transforming qualifying laps from adrenaline-fuelled sprints into calculated energy-saving exercises. The racing equivalent of Sunday driving had invaded motorsport's pinnacle.
On the grid, Liam Lawson's Racing Bulls nearly ground to a halt at the start as the turbo system failed to deliver the required punch. Only Franco Colapinto's lightning reflexes prevented a catastrophic collision.
Post-race, Lando Norris warned that serious crashes could occur in future, given the considerable speed differences, whilst the majority of the 130 overtakes were artificial rather than genuine racing battles.
The FIA now faces a difficult equation. There have been discussions on superclipping modifications, allowing cars to brake at full throttle to recharge batteries more efficiently.
Some teams advocate raising energy recovery limits to enable drivers to push harder, but this solution carries a severe cost, as lap times would plummet by several seconds.
Alternatively, limiting the battery's influence presents equally unpalatable consequences. The 50-50 engine concept cannot be overhauled overnight, meaning further changes to the cars would have to be made.
Formula 1 finds itself imprisoned by its own ambitions. These regulations lured manufacturers into the championship with promises of road-relevant technology and sustainable racing. Abandoning the formula after one season would surely trigger an exodus, potentially destroying years of investment and development.
The sport then faces a major challenge. Every proposed solution would likely create a new problem, while maintaining the status quo could erode F1's fundamental appeal.
With teams deep into 2026 development programmes and manufacturers committed to long-term strategies, F1 must somehow thread the needle between technological advancement and pure racing spectacle.
The window for major changes is rapidly closing, yet the current direction threatens to alienate the fans the sport has spent the past few years luring in.
below is the storey they posted, hard to argue it.
Formula 1's bold leap into the future has thrown up more questions than answers following the season-opening Australian Grand Prix, which exposed the fundamental flaws in the 2026 regulations.
The Albert Park circuit became a showcase of everything wrong with the new hybrid formula. Cars crawled to 60 kilometres per hour on the straight between Turns 8 and 9 as batteries drained at alarming rates. Energy management, not pure speed, dictated lap times in a contradiction of what F1 represents.
Onboard footage revealed drivers lifting off when they should be attacking, transforming qualifying laps from adrenaline-fuelled sprints into calculated energy-saving exercises. The racing equivalent of Sunday driving had invaded motorsport's pinnacle.
On the grid, Liam Lawson's Racing Bulls nearly ground to a halt at the start as the turbo system failed to deliver the required punch. Only Franco Colapinto's lightning reflexes prevented a catastrophic collision.
Post-race, Lando Norris warned that serious crashes could occur in future, given the considerable speed differences, whilst the majority of the 130 overtakes were artificial rather than genuine racing battles.
The FIA now faces a difficult equation. There have been discussions on superclipping modifications, allowing cars to brake at full throttle to recharge batteries more efficiently.
Some teams advocate raising energy recovery limits to enable drivers to push harder, but this solution carries a severe cost, as lap times would plummet by several seconds.
Alternatively, limiting the battery's influence presents equally unpalatable consequences. The 50-50 engine concept cannot be overhauled overnight, meaning further changes to the cars would have to be made.
Formula 1 finds itself imprisoned by its own ambitions. These regulations lured manufacturers into the championship with promises of road-relevant technology and sustainable racing. Abandoning the formula after one season would surely trigger an exodus, potentially destroying years of investment and development.
The sport then faces a major challenge. Every proposed solution would likely create a new problem, while maintaining the status quo could erode F1's fundamental appeal.
With teams deep into 2026 development programmes and manufacturers committed to long-term strategies, F1 must somehow thread the needle between technological advancement and pure racing spectacle.
The window for major changes is rapidly closing, yet the current direction threatens to alienate the fans the sport has spent the past few years luring in.
I watched the race, it did have some interesting aspects, more over taking, looks like cars can
atleast follow each other, but if its fake because of whos engineer set up energy harvesting the best,
it will get old fast, its not pure racing. As said above braking or coasting where you should be attacking.
Lando Norris said you spend half a lap looking at steering wheel, trying to figure out how much power you
have for next turn or straight.
I understand some big players got in the game because of this, but there has to be a better way.
atleast follow each other, but if its fake because of whos engineer set up energy harvesting the best,
it will get old fast, its not pure racing. As said above braking or coasting where you should be attacking.
Lando Norris said you spend half a lap looking at steering wheel, trying to figure out how much power you
have for next turn or straight.
I understand some big players got in the game because of this, but there has to be a better way.
AC Bill
Well-known member
Is this event televised?
AC Bill
Well-known member
I actually enjoyed the F1 race in spite of the numerous issues. There were several exciting moments.
It's going to take some time for teams and drivers to get these cars sorted. The battery boost is too short lived and is a danger in my opinion. It's like a on/off switch for a light. They should have designed a system that doesn't require re-charging as often. There is still a lot of sorting out needed.
You can see Ferrari's frustration in the Mercedes advantages. Both Lewis and Leclerc commented on the unfairness of compression ratios they apparently have. I expect there will be more FIA discussions on this aspect.
Sorry to see Hadjar's engine failure, as he was doing pretty good up till that point. Max once again proves his skills, or, has RedBull just figured the team cars out far better than others. Linblad proved he was a good choice for the RB team finishing in the top ten in his very first F1 race. He definitely has some skills.
Shanghai will offer a whole new set of challenges for the teams. That race should be interesting to say the least.
It's going to take some time for teams and drivers to get these cars sorted. The battery boost is too short lived and is a danger in my opinion. It's like a on/off switch for a light. They should have designed a system that doesn't require re-charging as often. There is still a lot of sorting out needed.
You can see Ferrari's frustration in the Mercedes advantages. Both Lewis and Leclerc commented on the unfairness of compression ratios they apparently have. I expect there will be more FIA discussions on this aspect.
Sorry to see Hadjar's engine failure, as he was doing pretty good up till that point. Max once again proves his skills, or, has RedBull just figured the team cars out far better than others. Linblad proved he was a good choice for the RB team finishing in the top ten in his very first F1 race. He definitely has some skills.
Shanghai will offer a whole new set of challenges for the teams. That race should be interesting to say the least.
Ya it’s weird for sure
I liked the passing
Lots of issues to solve , they say Melbourne is one of the worst tracks for harvesting
Guess we will see
The going from 500 bhp to 1000 bhp
And back in. An instant will take drivers and us
A bit to get used to
See if fia does anything and how teams adjust
China next week fast turn around for round 2
I liked the passing
Lots of issues to solve , they say Melbourne is one of the worst tracks for harvesting
Guess we will see
The going from 500 bhp to 1000 bhp
And back in. An instant will take drivers and us
A bit to get used to
See if fia does anything and how teams adjust
China next week fast turn around for round 2
Seems F-1 and FOM have had conversations about Melbourne,
I agree there needs to be some tweaks. The are going to get more data from China
to be sure as they said " we don't want to change something, then have to change back"
They from the beginnning realized that they would have to be more flexible than in the past
with quicker changes. From maybe how it harvests or deploys,
even if possible more power from engine, less from electrical if possible.
Also with possible two race cancellation, there could be a 5 week break after Japan,
which would give teams time for bigger changes.
Saudi Arabia & Bahrain, could be canccled F-1 being f-1 it would hurt, those are big money makes
Go figure, never mind all the other problems, where gonna lose some money
I agree there needs to be some tweaks. The are going to get more data from China
to be sure as they said " we don't want to change something, then have to change back"
They from the beginnning realized that they would have to be more flexible than in the past
with quicker changes. From maybe how it harvests or deploys,
even if possible more power from engine, less from electrical if possible.
Also with possible two race cancellation, there could be a 5 week break after Japan,
which would give teams time for bigger changes.
Saudi Arabia & Bahrain, could be canccled F-1 being f-1 it would hurt, those are big money makes
Go figure, never mind all the other problems, where gonna lose some money